Katy Perry Wins Copyright Infringement Case Over Claim by Christian Rapper

On March 10, 2022, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling in favor of Katy Perry that overturned a $2.78 million judgment against the iconic pop star. The dispute stems from an 8-note pattern, known in the music world as an “ostinato,” that was featured in Perry’s 2013 hit “Dark Horse.” Christian rapper Marcus Gray, who goes by the stage name “Flame,” first sued Perry and Capitol Records in 2014 arguing that the 8-note melody was substantially similar to his song “Joyful Noise,” thereby infringing his copyright. Perry told a Los Angeles jury that she had never heard [...]

2022-04-29T12:21:05+00:00April 29th, 2022|

Cheating On Exams May Just Have Gotten More Serious

Posting college exam questions online is a tried-and-true strategy practiced by less ethical students for decades. A Chapman University professor may have just found a way to hit back. Professor David Berkovitz of Chapman University’s George L. Argyros School of Business and Economics filed a complaint against five anonymous students in the U.S. District Court in California this past March. He found portions of midterm and final exam questions from his Spring 2021 Business Law course posted on an online forum for students called Course Hero. His complaint alleges that the students infringed his copyright right to “reproduce, make copies, [...]

2022-04-22T13:42:15+00:00April 22nd, 2022|

Battle Over Animal-Shaped Trademarks Heats Up

London-based retailer Marks & Spencer finds itself back in court - this time at the receiving end of a trademark infringement claim. Marks & Spencer recently sued German grocery chain Aldi, claiming the chain infringed its Colin the Caterpillar cake and Christmas glitter gin marks by selling similar looking items. Now, the British retailer is itself being sued by French fashion firm Lacoste for allegedly infringing its iconic crocodile logo. Lacoste claims that by using similar crocodile images on dungarees, duvet covers, and other clothing and accessories, M&S are creating a likelihood of confusion between the brands and taking advantage [...]

2022-04-15T12:47:03+00:00April 15th, 2022|

What Can Be Claimed as Intellectual Property?

When working in a field where you’re creating or developing new ideas and materials, it can be complicated to know what is defined as intellectual property and who owns it — especially when you’re first getting started. Intellectual property deals with a wide range of concepts, from creative ideas to algorithms. This means that knowing how to identify intellectual property, its ownership, and the basics of it will help you immensely in the long run. How California Law Defines Intellectual Property To be able to determine whether something can be claimed as intellectual property, you first need to know what [...]

2022-04-18T13:30:14+00:00April 11th, 2022|

Does Your Employer Own Your Intellectual Property in California?

You deserve credit for your own ideas. Unfortunately, sometimes employers can claim that your ideas or the work that you’ve done with them are their own. Ownership of intellectual property in California can be difficult to determine, especially without the help of an experienced attorney. It gets particularly complicated when your employer is involved and your intellectual property becomes a question of employment. If you have concerns about whether your employer owns your intellectual property, it’s best to discuss your case with an experienced California intellectual property attorney. What Is Considered Intellectual Property in California? According to California law, intellectual [...]

2022-04-18T13:19:43+00:00April 11th, 2022|

Drake and Chris Brown Seek to Dismiss Claim that their Hit “No Guidance” Was Stolen

Rap stars Drake and Chris Brown have asked a U.S. District Court in Florida to dismiss a copyright claim alleging that the pair “copied” another duo’s song when they wrote their 2019 hit “No Guidance.” Brandon Cooper and Timothy Valentine filed a claim against Drake and Brown in October, asserting that “No Guidance” was copied or principally “derived” from “the beat, lyrics, hook, rhythmic structure, metrical placement, and narrative context” of their song “I Love Your Dress.” The pair seek monetary damages including no less than 50 percent of all direct and indirect revenues generated by “No Guidance.” The attorneys [...]

2022-04-11T12:16:32+00:00April 8th, 2022|
Go to Top